Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis. DESIGN: Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis. SETTING: Virginia hospitals performing HTx. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use). CONCLUSIONS: Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Retrospective Comparison of Recombinant Activated Factor VII Versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidences of postoperative thrombotic complications, transfusion of blood products, and chest tube output in congenital cardiac surgical patients who received either recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study. SETTING: Patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium databases, as well as from manual chart review. Adjusted p values were obtained from multivariate regression using age (days), surgeon (number), cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes), and need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (yes/no). A total of 55 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group, and 89 in the rFVIIa group. The median dose of rFVIIa was 77 mcg/kg (46-88), and the median dose of 4F-PCC was 31 IU/kg (24-43). The incidences of thrombotic complications were 8% in the 4F-PCC group and 30% in the rFVIIa group (adjusted p = 0.023). No difference was reported between the groups regarding chest tube output on days 1 and 2 or transfusion of blood products. Using a sensitivity analysis with propensity matching, the incidence of thrombosis was 10% in the 4F-PCC group (n = 38), and 31% in the rFVIIa group (n = 39) (p = 0.036). No difference was reported in terms of bleeding or transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggested that the administration of rFVIIa was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic complications when compared to 4F-PCC, without benefits in terms of bleeding and transfusions.

COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONCENTRATE OF ALL PROTHROMBIN COMPLEX FACTORS WITH RECOMBINANT HUMAN COAGULATION FACTOR VIIa IN THE TREATMENT OF BLEEDING AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The authors evaluated the effectiveness of treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in patients with massive postoperative bleeding that could not be controlled with traditional therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: In the period from 2020 to 2021, recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa was administered to 18 patients after cardiac surgery (group I), while the concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors was administered to 16 patients postoperatively (group II). During this period, 647 patients were operated on. The patients had normal coagulation screening tests (APTT, INR, TT, fibrinogen level, and PLT level) before surgery. Mean blood loss before and after administration of eptacog alfa and the total prothrombin complex concentrate was assessed. The mean dose of eptacog alfa was 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., and the total prothrombin complex factor concentrate dose was 14.17 mcg/kg b.w. After transfusion with red blood cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate, in the absence of improvement in the dynamics of postoperative drainage, it was decided to include recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa or a concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in the treatment. RESULTS: Results: After administration of recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa at a dose of 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients, but the remaining 6 patients required reoperation due to persistently high drainage. The decision to perform a rethoracotomy was made by a team of cardiothoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists, taking into account the dynamics of drainage (bleeding) and the hemodynamic stability of the patient. After the administration of concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors at a dose of 14.17 U/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients. Four patients required reoperation due to persistent bleeding. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors is effective and safe for cardiac surgery patients.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of eptacog beta (coagulation factor VIIa [recombinant]-jncw) for the treatment of hemophilia A and B with inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Bypassing agents (BPAs) are used to treat acute bleeding episodes, manage bleeding during perioperative care, and prophylactically minimize bleed occurrence in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors (PwHABI). However, the effectiveness of BPAs that have been prescribed for the last several decades can be variable, motivating the development of a new recombinant activated factor VII, eptacog beta. AREAS COVERED: This review covers key eptacog beta findings from phase 1b and phase 3 (PERSEPT) clinical trials, which formed the basis for its regulatory approval to treat PwHABI ages 12 and older. Descriptions of eptacog beta structure and glycosylation profile, mechanism of action, preclinical study results, and cost analyses are also presented. EXPERT OPINION: PwHABI have had only two options for bleed treatment for the past several decades. With its distinct glycosylation profile, eptacog beta offers a novel therapy aiming to improve upon BPAs currently in use, providing an option with more than one dosing regimen and a rapid response that allows most bleeds to be treated with just one dose. This has become particularly important given the use of subcutaneous medications (e.g., emicizumab) for prophylaxis of bleeding. Clinicians should consider eptacog beta as a BPA for all PwHABI.

Prophylactic Recombinant Factor VIIa for Preventing Massive Transfusion During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: RecombinanthumanactivatedfactorVIIahas been usedprophylactically to mitigate requirements for transfusion in liver transplant. We explored its effectiveness andrisks amonglivertransplantrecipients at high risk for massive transfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of recipients who underwent liver transplant from 2012 to 2015. Patients considered at risk for massive transfusion received up to two 20 µg/kg doses of recombinant human activated factor VIIa, with rescue use permitted for other patients. We used propensity matching to determine the average treatment effectson patients who received recombinant human activated factor VIIa prophylactically to prevent massive transfusion. We determined thromboembolic events from medical record review. RESULTS: Of 234 liver transplant recipients, 38 received prophylactic and 2 received rescue recombinant human activated factor VIIa. We used a prediction model to readily identify those who would receive prophylactic recombinant human activated factorVIIa (C statistic = 0.885; 95% CI, 0.835-0.935). Propensity matching achieved balance, particularly for massive transfusion. Twenty-three of 38 patients (60.5%) who received recombinant human activated factorVIIa and 47 of 76 matched controls (61.8%) experienced massive transfusion. The coefficient for the average treatment effect of prophylactic administration was - 0.013 (95% CI, -0.260 to 0.233; P = .92). The cohorts exhibited no difference in number ofthromboembolic events (P > .99), although fatal events occurred in 1 patient who had prophylactic and 1 patient who had rescue recombinant human activated factor VIIa. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic recombinanthumanactivated factor VIIa use in patients at elevated risk of massive transfusion did not affect incidence of massive transfusion and was not associated with an increase in thromboembolic events overall. The lack of clinical benefit and the potential for fatal throm-boembolic events observed with recombinant human activated factor VIIa precluded its prophylactic use in liver transplant recipients.

Eptacog beta efficacy and safety in the treatment and control of bleeding in paediatric subjects (<12 years) with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Eptacog beta is a new recombinant activated human factor VII bypassing agent approved in the United States for the treatment and control of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors 12 years of age or older. AIM: To prospectively assess in a phase 3 clinical trial (PERSEPT 2) eptacog beta efficacy and safety for treatment of bleeding in children <12 years of age with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors. METHODS: Using a randomised crossover design, subjects received initial doses of 75 or 225 µg/kg eptacog beta followed by 75 µg/kg dosing at predefined intervals (as determined by clinical response) to treat bleeding episodes (BEs). Treatment success criteria included a haemostasis evaluation of 'excellent' or 'good' without use of additional eptacog beta, alternative haemostatic agent or blood product, and no increase in pain following the first 'excellent' or 'good' assessment. RESULTS: Treatment success proportions in 25 subjects (1-11 years) who experienced 546 mild or moderate BEs were 65% in the 75 µg/kg initial dose regimen (IDR) and 60% in the 225 µg/kg IDR 12 h following initial eptacog beta infusion. By 24 h, the treatment success proportions were 97% for the 75 µg/kg IDR and 98% for the 225 µg/kg IDR. No thrombotic events, allergic reactions, neutralising antibodies or treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Both 75 and 225 µg/kg eptacog beta IDRs provided safe and effective treatment and control of bleeding in children <12 years of age.

Bleeding in patients with hemophilia who have inhibitors: Modeling US medical system utilization and cost avoidance between recombinant factor VIIa products with different clinical dosing requirements.

BACKGROUND: A mainstay of treatment in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors (PWIs) is the use of a recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) bypassing agent. A new rFVIIa product may allow reduced rFVIIa utilization for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs). OBJECTIVE: A decision analytic health economic model was developed to compare the utilization and consequent need for bleed-related clinical encounters of 2 rFVIIa products, with the International Nomenclature Name of eptacog alfa (EA) and eptacog beta (EB). METHODS: This study uses recent, peer-reviewed, and published data from clinical trials with similar endpoints for 1 million insured male lives in the United States. rFVIIa product utilization was modeled in hemophilia (A and B) PWI for on-demand treatment of BEs with rFVIIa treatment. Estimated annual BE rates were modeled to include prophylaxis and on-demand management. The clinical encounter avoidance estimates are based on refractory bleeding through 24 hours. RESULTS: In a cohort of 1 million insured, 5-6 patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors annually receive on-demand treatment for a total of 59 mild/moderate BEs. The model suggests that EB requires less unit utilization per BE (13,125 µg and 17,850 µg for the 75µg/kg and 225µg/kg dose regimens, respectively) than EA 90 µg/kg dosing (20,178µg), with wholesale acquisition costs expanding the difference. Further, both EB initial dose regimens would permit decreased total nonmedication health plan spending for the acute treatment of BEs by reducing the need for clinical encounters arising from BEs that fail to respond within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: With reduced infusion requirements, the model consistently shows that EB could generate lower insured-cohort drug utilization, as well as reduce costly clinical encounters by keeping mild and moderate BEs amenable to home bypassing agent management. DISCLOSURES: The article was funded by HEMA Biologic, LLC. The authors approved all content and results in this article without being subject to sponsor censorship. Mr Jensen, Mr Cyr, and Ms Hathway are employees of PRECISIONheor, which provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry, including HEMA Biologics, LLC. Dr Batt is an advisor to PRECISIONheor. Dr Alexander is a former employee of HEMA Biologics, LLC, and provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry.

Efficacy, Safety, and Strategies for Recombinant-Activated Factor VII in Cardiac Surgical Bleeding: A Narrative Review.

As perioperative bleeding continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery, the search continues for an ideal hemostatic agent for use in this patient population. Transfusion of blood products has been associated both with increased costs and risks, such as infection, prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased length of stay, and decreased survival. Recombinant-activated factor VII (rFVIIa) first was approved for the US market in 1999 and since that time has been used in a variety of clinical settings. This review summarizes the existing literature pertaining to perioperative rFVIIa, in addition to society recommendations and current guidelines regarding its use in cardiac surgery.

Eptacog Beta for Bleeding Treatment and Prevention in Congenital Hemophilia A and B With Inhibitors: A Review of Clinical Data and Implications for Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, dosing and administration, safety, clinical efficacy, and role of eptacog beta in the treatment of congenital hemophilia with inhibitors. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed (1966 to August 2021) was conducted using the keywords eptacog beta, recombinant FVII, and hemophilia. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant published articles and prescribing information on eptacog beta for the treatment of congenital hemophilia with inhibitors were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eptacog beta is a novel recombinant activated factor VII (rVIIa) product that demonstrated efficacy in controlling bleeding and associated pain in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Eptacog beta has limited Food and Drug Administration-approved and off-label indications compared with other bypassing agents (BPAs; activated prothrombin complex concentrates [aPCC; eptacog alfa]). Eptacog beta costs less than eptacog alfa, but still more than aPCCs. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review provides insight into the role of eptacog beta for treatment of congenital hemophilia with inhibitors and reviews important health system formulary considerations for available BPAs. CONCLUSIONS: Eptacog beta is more cost-effective than eptacog alfa and, as such, may become the preferred rVIIa formulary product. However, eptacog alfa availability remains necessary for the treatment of disorders where eptacog beta has limited data. aPCC should remain the first-line BPA for the treatment of bleeding in patients with inhibitors with no contraindications to use because of its equivocal efficacy and safety and in light of the magnitude of cost savings associated with this strategy.

Recombinant Factor VIIa in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Recombinant activated factor VIIa (rVIIa) is used off-label for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. This study reviewed the indications, usage rates, and complications of rVIIa. DESIGN: A retrospective case-control observational study. SETTING: A single quaternary pediatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass over a three-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of rVIIa as rescue therapy for refractory bleeding after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Onethousand, five hundred fifteen cardiopulmonary bypass procedures were reviewed. Patients receiving rVIIa were each matched to two control patients by age, procedure type, and bypass time. Data collected included weight, crossclamp time, anticoagulant and antifibrinolytic dose, return to the operating room for bleeding, thrombotic events, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit interventions. Forty-two patients received rVIIa (2.8%). Major systemic thrombotic complications were observed in 19% (controls 12.5%) of patients; 80% of recombinant factor VIIa patients requiring postoperative ECMO had interventions for circuit thrombosis (controls 31.25%); 4.76% of rVIIa recipients required reexploration for intractable bleeding (controls 1.39%). CONCLUSIONS: This study added to understanding regarding the use of recombinant factor VIIa in pediatric cardiac surgery and reported increased thrombotic complications, especially for children who progress to ECMO. Prospective studies to better understand the pathophysiology of coagulopathy and hemorrhage in pediatric cardiac surgery and the role of hemostatic agents, such as rVIIa, are required.

The safety of activated eptacog beta in the management of bleeding episodes and perioperative haemostasis in adult and paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia patients with inhibitors often require a bypassing agent (BPA) for bleeding episode management. Eptacog beta (EB) is a new FDA-approved recombinant activated human factor VII BPA for the treatment and control of bleeding in haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors (≥12 years of age). We describe here the EB safety profile from the three prospective Phase 3 clinical trials performed to date. AIM: To assess EB safety, immunogenicity and thrombotic potential in children and adults who received EB for treatment of bleeding and perioperative care. METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design, 27 subjects in PERSEPT 1 (12-54 years) and 25 subjects in PERSEPT 2 (1-11 years) treated bleeding episodes with 75 or 225 µg/kg EB initially followed by 75 µg/kg dosing at predefined intervals as determined by clinical response. Twelve PERSEPT 3 subjects (2-56 years) received an initial preoperative infusion of 75 µg/kg (minor procedures) or 200 µg/kg EB (major surgeries) with subsequent 75 µg/kg doses administered intraoperatively and post-operatively as indicated. Descriptive statistics were used for data analyses. RESULTS: Sixty subjects who received 3388 EB doses in three trials were evaluated. EB was well tolerated, with no allergic, hypersensitivity, anaphylactic or thrombotic events reported and no neutralizing anti-EB antibodies detected. A death occurred during PERSEPT 3 and was determined to be unlikely related to EB treatment by the data monitoring committee. CONCLUSION: Results from all three Phase 3 trials establish an excellent safety profile of EB in haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors for treatment of bleeding and perioperative use.

Use of recombinant activated factor VII for the treatment of perioperative bleeding in noncardiac surgery patients without hemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in noncardiac patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved the use of rFVIIa through December 13, 2019 in noncardiac patients without hemophilia. Two investigators extracted the related data and assessed the quality of the included trials. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs examining 993 perioperative patients were ultimately included. The use of rFVIIa did not decrease all-cause mortality (RR:0.90; 95% CI:0.50,1.64; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.738), shorten the length of ICU (SMD:-0.15; 95% CI:-0.47,0.17; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.346) or hospital (SMD:0.42; 95% CI:-0.05,0.89; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.078) stay, or increase incidence of the thromboembolic events (RR:1.30; 95% CI:0.70,2.41; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.403) among perioperative patients. However, individual RCT analyses showed that the use of rFVIIa could reduce the volume of blood loss (including prostatic cancer, severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), and spinal disease) and the transfusion of RBCs (including prostatic cancer, SAP, and spinal disease) and FFP (SAP) in a subset of perioperative patients. Publication bias was not present. CONCLUSIONS: For perioperative hemorrhagic patients, rFVIIa-based hemostatic therapy showed no effect on mortality, ICU or hospital LOS, or the rate of thromboembolic events, although it appears to decrease blood loss and reduce the need for blood product transfusion in a subset of patients.

The Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Patients with Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia.

Platelet transfusion is the standard treatment to control or prevent bleeding in patients with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (GT), but platelets are often unavailable. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an effective alternative to platelets in patients with GT with past/present refractoriness to platelet transfusions and antibodies to platelets. However, there is an unmet need for an alternative to platelets in patients without antibodies. This report summarizes evidence of efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with GT without refractoriness or antibodies to platelets from three different sources: the Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia Registry (GTR), published literature (January 01, 1999 to December 01, 2017), and the Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database. In the GTR, 133 patients received rFVIIa for the treatment of 333 bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in 157 surgical procedures. Overall efficacy rates were 79 and 88%, respectively, in patients treated for bleeding episodes or for the prevention of bleeding during surgery; effectiveness was generally similar across refractoriness/antibody status categories. Median dose per infusion of rFVIIa was close to that recommended for patients with GT (90 µg/kg). Data from 14 published case reports also demonstrated that rFVIIa is effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with GT without antibodies to platelets. Analysis of adverse events reported in GTR and in Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database did not raise any new safety concerns. These data supported the label extension of rFVIIa to include cases where platelets are not readily available, which was approved by the European Medicines Agency in December 2018.

Reversal strategies and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: Evaluate reversal strategies in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational cohort of AF patients with warfarin-associated ICH at two referral hospitals (2007-2010), with patient features, reversal agents, and outcomes collected from medical records. RESULTS: Among 498 ICH patients 403 received fresh frozen plasma (FFP) without 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), 65 received PCCs or rFVIIa, mostly with FFP, and 30 received no acute reversal agents. Median time from presentation to reversal agent administration was 3.4 h (IQR 2.3-5.3). INR was reversed to ≤1.4 by 6 h post-presentation in 46% of patients receiving PCCs/rFVIIa versus 15% receiving FFP alone (p<0.0001). Among PCCs/rFVIIa recipients, 31% died in-hospital vs. 24% receiving FFP alone (p=0.27). Adjusted OR for death accounting for age and Glasgow Coma Score was 0.78 (0.36-1.69) for PCCs/rFVIIa vs FFP only and 1.16 (0.59-2.27) comparing those reaching vs. not reaching INR ≤ 1.4 at 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with PCCs/rFVIIa led to faster INR reversal than treatment with FFP alone. Neither treatment with PCCs/rFVIIa nor rapid INR reversal was associated with improved survival. Delays receiving PCCs may largely eliminate the benefit of treatment.

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven®) utilization at a large academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (Novoseven®) is utilized for the reversal of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery. In August 2015, rFVIIa was transferred from the blood bank to the pharmacy at New York University (NYU) Langone Health. Concordantly, an off-label dosing guideline was developed. The objective of this study was to describe utilization and cost of rFVIIa and assess compliance to our dosing guideline. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational review of rFVIIa administrations post-implementation of an off-label dosing guideline. All patients who received rFVIIa between September 2015 and June 2017 were evaluated. For each rFVIIa administration, anticoagulation and laboratory values, indications for use, dosing, ordering and administration times, concomitant blood products, and adverse events were collected. Adverse events included venous thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to systemic embolism and mortality. The primary endpoint was the utilization of rFVIIa in accordance with the off-label dosing guideline. Secondary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa, adverse events, blood products administered, and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa transition to pharmacy. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients [pediatric (n = 6), adult (n = 57)] received rFVIIa, with the majority of use for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. The utilization of rVIIa decreased after development of the off-label dosing guideline and transition from blood bank to pharmacy. The total incidence of thromboembolic events within 30 days was 19.6%; 17.6% arterial and 2% venous; 70% of patients with an adverse event were over 70 years of age. Use of rFVIIa reduced the median number of units of blood products administered. CONCLUSION: Administration of rFVIIa for cardiac surgery appears to be effective for hemostasis. Transitioning rFVIIa from the blood bank to pharmacy and implementation of a dosing guideline appears to have reduced utilization. Patients receiving rFVIIa should be monitored for thromboembolic events. Elderly patients may be at higher risk for thromboembolic events.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a recombinant fusion protein linking activated coagulation factor VII with human albumin (rVIIa-FP) in patients with congenital FVII deficiency.

Objectives: Recombinant fusion protein linking activated factor VIIa to human albumin (rVIIa-FP) is a therapeutic option designed to prevent and treat bleeding events in patients with congenital FVII deficiency with reduced infusion frequency compared to current FVII treatments. This study characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rVIIa-FP.Methods: A phase I multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, single-dose study (NCT02470871) was conducted in nine patients with severe congenital FVII deficiency. Patients received their routine FVII product (30 IU/kg plasma-derived FVII [pdFVII] or 25 µg/kg recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) [eptacog alfa]), and were then randomly assigned to receive 100 or 300 µg/kg of rVIIa-FP. Blood samples for PK and PD assessments were drawn up to 48 hr after administration. FVIIa activity was determined using a one-stage clotting assay. PD parameters were derived from thrombin generation testing, using the Nijmegen hemostasis assay.Results: rVIIa-FP showed improved PK compared to rFVIIa, with 2- to 3-fold longer t1/2 and 4- to 8-fold lower clearance. Analysis of PD data showed a sustained suppression of lag time below 4.5 min (upper limit of healthy people) for rVIIa-FP compared to rFVIIa. AUEC and ECmax were similar across the two dose groups of rVIIa-FP and rFVIIa.Discussion: rVIIa-FP was well tolerated in patients with congenital FVII deficiency, showed a longer half-life and lower clearance compared to rFVIIa, and lag time remaining within healthy ranges for ≥8 hr.Conclusion: These results warrant further investigation into the efficacy of rVIIa-FP to control and prevent bleeding in patients with FVII deficiency.

Perioperative safety and haematostatic efficacy of a new bypassing agent pd-FVIIa/FX (Byclot) in haemophilia patients with high-responding type inhibitors.

: The novel agent pd-FVIIa/FX is a 1 : 10 protein weight mixture of activated factor VII (FVIIa) and factor X (FX) derived from donated blood plasma. A phase III clinical trial of pd-FVIIa/FX revealed high efficacy for bleeding episodes in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. However, up to now, only one case of this new agent being used for surgery had been reported. The objective of this study is to evaluate the perioperative haemostatic efficacy and safety of pd-FVIIa/FX in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. We retrospectively reviewed 25 operation charts from 14 haemophilia patients with high-responding inhibitors using pd-FVIIa/FX during the perioperative period. Efficacy was evaluated by attending physicians and results divided into four groups (excellent, good, fair, and poor). The operation chart was provided by nine Japanese medical institutes with expertise in haemophilia management. Out of the total of 25 surgical procedures, 44% (11/25) were classified as major surgery and the remainders were minor surgeries. In all of the surgeries but one, rFVIIa and/or APCC were administered in combination or sequential method. In all cases except one, the haemostatic efficiency rate was judged as excellent or good by treating physicians for an overall efficacy rate of 96%. No thrombotic adverse effects were reported. This study's results suggest that both combination and sequential therapy of pd-FVIIa/FX and other bypassing agents are well tolerated and effective for the control of perioperative bleeding in haemophilia patients with high-responding inhibitors.

Safety analysis of rFVIIa with emicizumab dosing in congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors: Experience from the HAVEN clinical program.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; eptacog alfa activated, NovoSeven® , Novo Nordisk A/S) is a bypassing agent used in congenital hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Emicizumab (Hemlibra® ; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd) is a recombinant, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody used for routine prophylaxis in patients with congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors. Concomitant use of the hemostatic agents rFVIIa and emicizumab carries a theoretical increased risk of thrombotic complications. Roche and Novo Nordisk collaboratively analyzed all available data on the use of rFVIIa in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis in the Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Emicizumab Versus no Prophylaxis in Hemophilia A Participants With Inhibitors (HAVEN) clinical development program. OBJECTIVE: Obtain further insights into the concomitant clinical use and safety of rFVIIa and emicizumab. METHODS: The initial individual rFVIIa dose, dosing intervals and cumulative dosing were evaluated in the HAVEN 1, HAVEN 2, and HAVEN 4 trials. All adverse events reported in each of the three trials in patients treated with rFVIIa, including available narratives, were assessed. RESULTS: The vast majority of bleeds occurred in HAVEN 1. When rFVIIa was used to treat a bleeding episode, a 100 ± 20 µg/kg dose was used to initiate treatment in the majority of cases. The dosing interval, as well as cumulative dosing were consistent with prescribing information and current practice. No serious adverse events, no thrombotic microangiopathy cases, or thromboembolic events were assessed to be associated with rFVIIa when used in conjunction with emicizumab prophylaxis in the HAVEN trials. CONCLUSION: rFVIIa use in the context of emicizumab prophylaxis does not change the rFVIIa safety profile as described in the product information.